National

  1.  These are national examples of the ECPQIM/DMLMA approach (#8).   The following national publications are from the Office of Head Start (OHS), Office of Child Care (OCC), Administration for Children and Families (ACF),  Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), and Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS); and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA):

 

 


2)  Listed below are links to examples of differential monitoring, risk assessment and key indicator methodologies from NARA – National Association for Regulatory Administration.   For the future, NARA will be the repository of all my research papers, all future research papers and reports as well as maintaining a blog on differential monitoring, risk assessment and key indicators.

Overview:

Brochure and Webpage:

Flyer, PPT, and Audio Presentation:

Key Indicator, Risk Assessment, Coaching and Monitoring Paradigm Examples:



3)  The key indicator methodology has been applied and is being used with the National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA).  Here are links to their website describing its standards and research validating the approach:



4)  The National Head Start Association’s Monitoring Task Force in their 2012 and 2016 Reports on Monitoring highlighted examples of Differential Monitoring, Risk Assessment, and Key Indicator Systems:



5)  And lastly, here is an international example with the cruise industry where child care occurs on their cruise ships.  This resulted from a project with Royal Caribbean in helping to develop standards for their youth activity programs.  The staff of Royal Caribbean showed a great deal of flexibility and creativity in utilizing the key indicator and risk assessment methodologies in developing the standards:




logos-riki-nara-psu-page-001




 

Advertisements