Affiliated with the Penn State University Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center and in strategic partnership with the National Association for Regulatory Administration

Here are several Technical Research Notes and Papers updating, refining, and validating the differential monitoring, risk assessment and key indicator methodologies:

There is a very useful analytical technique which can be used with the above validation papers that I would suggest (Classification Matrix and Sensitivity Analysis for Validating Licensing Key Indicators)(better known in the statistical and data analysis field as the “Confusion Matrix”) researchers using which provides several measures to determine if the Licensing Key Indicator methodology is working as it should.  Please pay particular attention to the following measures: accuracy, correlation, and false negatives when determining the validity of your Licensing Key Indicator System.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from RIKI - Research Institute for Key Indicators Data Laboratory

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading